Legal Opinion

American Hangar, Inc. v. Basic Line, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 25, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-1555-GPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SECOND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 37 (#22)

ROBERT B. COLLINGS, United States Magistrate.

On February 25, 1985, I allowed Plaintiff’s Motion To Compel Discovery Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 (# 22) to the extent that I issued an Order, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(2), F.R.Civ.P., requiring the defendant’s witnesses whom the plaintiff was deposing to answer the questions put to them at their depositions which they had refused to answer on instructions from defendant’s counsel. I deferred for later hearing that portion of plaintiff’s motion in which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liew v. BreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  3. Hulvat v. Royal Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1967

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Riddell Sports Inc. v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Booker v. Stauffer Seeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  4. Nutmeg Insurance v. Atwell, Vogel & SterlingDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1988
  5. Athridge v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API