Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. Wilkinson
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants John Wilkinson, Sharon Taul-man, and Robert Canales have filed a motion to compel the production of 112 documents withheld from discovery by Plaintiff Navi-gant Consulting, Inc. (“NCI”) on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
I
NCI provides class action settlement processing services to clients in the United States and Canada. (Plf. Sec. Am. Compl. at 2,1110). Among these services are compiling information…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Stoffels v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Kelly v. Gaines, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Microtune, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.