Legal Opinion

Navigant Consulting, Inc. v. Wilkinson

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 29, 2004No. 3-02-CV-2186-DPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants John Wilkinson, Sharon Taul-man, and Robert Canales have filed a motion to compel the production of 112 documents withheld from discovery by Plaintiff Navi-gant Consulting, Inc. (“NCI”) on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and attorney work product. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I

NCI provides class action settlement processing services to clients in the United States and Canada. (Plf. Sec. Am. Compl. at 2,1110). Among these services are compiling information…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Wells Dairy, Inc. v. American Industrial Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  2. Stoffels v. SBC Communications, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2009
  3. Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Kelly v. Gaines, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Microtune, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2009

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API