Legal Opinion
Hyde Const. Co. v. Fricken-Schmidt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 24, 1929No. 19364PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
This action was brought in the district court of Garfield county by Fr. Frickenschmidt on the bond of the Hyde Construction Company, against the company and H. I-I. Champlin, its surety, to recover $369.89 for oats alleged to have been furnished to Johnnie Jones for his teams, while working as a subcontractor for the Hyde Construction Company in paving the state highway. There are but two questions in the case to which our attention is called, and on which a reversal is asked. They are:
First. The plaintiff’s evidence failed for the reason that under the terms of the bond there would be a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Fuller v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Eagle Oil Co. v. AltmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Carl v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Southern Surety Co. v. CorbitSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Bank of Earlsboro v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Green Construction Co. v. ChornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.