Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 1930No. 3 Div. 907PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The original complaint, several petitions for intervention, and demurrers sustained thereto present the questions thoroughly argued by many of counsel. These pleadings, the appeal, .and assignments of error directly raise the argued questions.

The first is whether the labor, material, gas, oil, tires, feedstuffs, and the supplies named in the complaint or interventions, and alleged to have been used in the execution of the work provided for in the original contract and -suretyship, were such as were within the purview of the provisions of the road contractors’ bond on which the suit was…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Huguley Water SystemSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yeilding Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Riley-Stabler Construction Company, a Division of Riley Lumber & Supply Company, Inc. v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API