Legal Opinion
Razavi v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 4, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-2375 (HHG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
I
Pending before the Court are cross motions for summary judgment in this action involving Amoco Oil Company’s (“Amoco”) decision to sell its facility located at 500 New Jersey Avenue, Northwest, in Washington, D.C. The plaintiff, Soheil Razavi, who was operating an Amoco service station at this location as a trial franchise claims that, in executing this sale, Amoco violated the Pe troleum Marketing Practices Act (“PMPA”), 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 2801-2806 (1982 and 1993 supp.). There are essentially four issues in dispute between the parties, and the lack of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michael D. Bayer v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Allen Greenberg v. Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Keener v. Exxon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Amy M. et al. v. Timberlane Sch.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. SlocumDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- KON BAGAT v. ANDREWS, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
- Keener v. Exxon Co. USACourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.