Legal Opinion
Lasko v. Consumers Petroleum of Connecticut, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 27, 1981No. Civ. B 81-386PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DALY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, John J. Lasko, the franchisee-proprietor of a gasoline service station in Fairfield, Connecticut, has brought this action for an injunction and damages, claiming that defendant-franchisor, Consumers Petroleum of Connecticut (Consumers), is attempting to terminate his franchise in violation of the federal Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. § 2801, et seq. and the Connecticut Franchise Act, 18 Conn.Gen.Stats. § 42-133e et seq. The case is currently before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William CAULFIELD Et Al., Appellants, v. the BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Ted's Tire Service Inc. v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
- Exxon Corp. v. Georgia Ass'n of Petroleum RetailersDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1979
- Escobar v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc. v. Ernst Enterprises, Inc., Richard H. Ernst and Eunice R. ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Harold J. Bellmore, Michael J. Fox, and James M. Montesanto, Harold J. Bellmore, Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Byron C. Darling, III v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Davis v. Gulf Oil Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.