State Ex Rel. South St. Paul v. Hetherington
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing an order to show-cause in the nature of an alternative writ of mandamus and sustaining the action of the county commissioners as to their manner of redistricting Dakota county, as required by M. S. A. 375.02, into districts composed of contiguous territory and containing as nearly as practicable an equal population.
The primary issue is whether proof of a gross disparity in the population of the various county commissioner districts in and of itself, without more, establishes that the board of commissioners has not complied with §…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney General v. Suffolk County Apportionment CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Ingelson v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State ex rel. Meighen v. WeatherillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Brooks v. State ex rel. SingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kahn v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Erlandson v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Ludwig v. Board of County Com'rs of Sarpy CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Hanlon v. ToweySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.