Yaist v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This action is before the court for a determination of the extent of damages to which plaintiff is entitled, following a decision by the Court of Claims which found that the defendant had effected a taking of plaintiff’s property.1 For the reasons stated in this opinion, the court finds that plaintiff is entitled to compensation in the amount of $9,266.56 plus interest and reimbursement of reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.
Factual Background 2
Plaintiff, Clyde R. Yaist,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.