Legal Opinion

Yaist v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 12, 1989No. 214-77PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FUTEY, Judge.

This action is before the court for a determination of the extent of damages to which plaintiff is entitled, following a decision by the Court of Claims which found that the defendant had effected a taking of plaintiff’s property.1 For the reasons stated in this opinion, the court finds that plaintiff is entitled to compensation in the amount of $9,266.56 plus interest and reimbursement of reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970.

Factual Background 2

Plaintiff, Clyde R. Yaist,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Abbey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
  5. Whispell Foreign Cars, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API