Legal Opinion

Reid v. Woods

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 1936No. 4-4320PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellee Woods recovered a judgment against W. A.. Eldred and Lee Eeid, from which only Reid has appealed, to compensate an injury, which appellee sustained, resulting from a collision of an automobile in which he was riding with another car owned by Reid, but being driven by Eldred. For the reversal of this judgment only one error is assigned and argued; and that is that the testimony does not show that Eldred, at the time of the collision, was the agent of Reid, or that Eldred was acting within the scope of his agency.

The testimony stated in the light most favorable to plaintiff, appellee,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Hunter v. First State Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Cahill v. BradfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Bizzell v. HamiterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. SimsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API