Bizzell v. Hamiter
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellant — who Was the plaintiff below— instituted this action against appellee to recover damages on account of the demolition of his automobile resulting from a collision between the automobile which appellant was driving and another owned by appellee and driven by his chauffeur. After all the testimony had been introduced, the court directed the jury to return a verdict in favor of appellee, which was done, and this appeal questions that action.
The testimony shows that, while appellant was driving his automobile near the intersection of Wright Avenue and High Street, in the city of Little…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mullins v. Ritchie Grocer CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- Ben M. Hogan & Co. v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
- Hunter v. First State Bank of MorriltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Ford & Son Sanitary Co. v. RansomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Cahill v. BradfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.