Legal Opinion

Cahill v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 8, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

M. E. Bradford is engaged in business as the M. E. Bradford Tire Company, and sells automobile tires in the county of Pulaski, and, as a part of tbe business, conducts what is called a road service, which consists in delivering tires and inner tubes on the roads and highways of the county as well as on the streets of the city of Little Rock, and, in connection therewith, owns and uses a number of service cars, with a driver for each car, who put on and installed the tires and inner tubes whenever he was called upon for such service.

Appellant Cahill was injured by the operation of one of these…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SturtivantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Healey v. CockrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Little Rock Traction & Electric Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  4. Garrison Company v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  5. Bizzell v. HamiterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Woodward v. BlytheSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Conway v. HudspethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  3. Weilbrenner v. OwensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  4. Andrews v. MoerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  5. Reed v. HumphreysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API