Legal Opinion

F. P. Dow, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 30, 1963No. Reap. Dec. 10616; Entry No. 3249PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

The issue before the court in reappraisement is the value, based on cost of production, of a machine described as an automatic bottle blow molding machine, used in the plastics industry. This machine was manufactured in England by E. Shipton & Co., Ltd., sold to Olympic Plastics Co., Inc. (for which plaintiff F. P. Dow, Inc., of Los Angeles, acted as customs broker), shipped from *441Middlesex, England, on June 14, 1957, and entered at the port of Los Angeles on July 24, 1957.

The machine was appraised on the basis of cost of production value, and that is the basis for which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. United States v. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. ex rel. Munising Wood Products Co.United States Customs Court · 1954
  3. Brauner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. United States v. Henry A. Wess, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Twist Drill Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. United States v. F. P. Dow, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Photo Devices, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API