United States v. Henry A. Wess, Inc.
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
RichaRdsoN, Judge:
This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of the trial court (Lawrence, J.), holding that cost of production, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1402(f) (§ 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930), was the proper basis for determining the value of 1,000 mechanical calendars, imported from Denmark, and that such value did not include a royalty and a commission, which were paid by the consignee to the patentee and an independent sales agent, respectively. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United States, 44 Cust. Ct. 747, Reap. Dec. 9724. It is conceded that cost of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Elenkrieg v. . SiebrechtNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Imperial Paper & Color Corp. v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
3Cited by5 opinions
- H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- F. P. Dow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- United States v. F. P. Dow, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1965
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972