Legal Opinion

Cleveland Twist Drill Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 6, 1968No. R.D. 11542; Entry No. 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

This reappraisement appeal involves licensed patents and connected fees included in the appraised value of a twist drill rolling machine, type SW-10, which plaintiffs imported from West Germany in September 1962. The machine was designed to use the licensed patents for producing twist drills.

I find, as the parties have stipulated, that the proper basis for ap-praisement of the machine is constructed value under section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, T.D. 54165. The only issue before me is the proper amount of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. F. P. Dow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. United States v. Barr Shipping Co.United States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API