Legal Opinion

United States v. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. ex rel. Munising Wood Products Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided June 14, 1954No. A. R. D. 44; Entry No. P 230PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EKwall, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of the trial court, Lawrence, J., holding that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), was the proper basis for determining the value of certain machines and parts imported from Canada and that such value was the invoice unit price of each item, plus its proportionate share of the cost of certain patterns, plus packing costs. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. for Munising Wood Products Co., Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 547, Reap. Dec. 8218.

It is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. A. W. Fenton Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. H. M. Young Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. F. P. Dow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Henry A. Wess, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. BBR Prestressed Tanks, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API