Brauner v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
This appeal for a reappraisement was filed pursuant to the provisions of section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1501).
The merchandise under consideration consists of parts of a so-called Lurgi acid distillation plant which was imported by E. F. Drew & Co., Inc., of New York, in a knockeddown condition. Brauner & Co. acted as customhouse broker.
The importation was invoiced at a total of $46,900. Entry was made at $46,900, plus 2% per centum export reimbursement, amounting to $1,172.50, to which was added $1,236 to cover a price rise in the cost of labor…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Rohner Gehrig & Co.United States Customs Court · 1940
- Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- United States v. Rohner Gehrig & Co.United States Customs Court · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- F. P. Dow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- United States v. Erb & Gray Scientific, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1965
- Erb & Gray Scientific, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
- United States v. F. P. Dow, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1965
- Erb & Gray Scientific, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.