Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Blean
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 14, 1912No. Civ. No. 979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an action to foreclose several mechanics’ liens. The appeal is from the judgment alone, and is brought to this court solely upon the judgment-roll.
In October, 1907, defendant John Weitzel entered into a contract with defendant Margaret E. Blean, under the terms oE which he was to construct a building on land belonging to her situated in Alameda county. This contract was in writing “and a portion thereof without the plans and specifications was recorded.”
In November, 1907, defendant Weitzel entered into an agreement with Panttaja, Latón en & Juniki, copartners, whereby said copartners…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Rea v. HaffendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Marble Lime Co. v. Lordsburg Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Edwards v. California Sweet Potato Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Tabler v. HarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Braun v. DallinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924