Legal Opinion

Crabb v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1936No. 25938. En BancPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This proceeding came to the superior court by an appeal from an order of the joint board of the department of labor and industries. When it was reached for trial to the court sitting without a jury, the department moved for a dismissal of the appeal. Before a ruling on tliat motion, a certified departmental record was introduced in evidence, or at least considered by the court with the consent of both parties. After consideration of the facts and of the briefs submitted, the trial court made findings from which we quote:

“That on December 19, 1932, appellant, while engaged in extrahazardous…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. StandleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Ehrhart v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. United States Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Spence v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Goenen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Leschner v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Gosek v. Garmer and Stiles CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  4. Rector v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  5. Grimes v. Lakeside IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API