Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Grimes v. Lakeside Industries

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 11, 1995No. 16744-1-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleisher, J.

The Board of Industrial Insurance Appeals (the Board) denied Gerald Grimes’s request to reopen his 1986 industrial injury claim. The Grays Harbor Superior Court reversed the Board’s order. Lakeside Industries (Lakeside) appeals, arguing that the court’s findings regarding both causation and aggravation of the injury are not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm.

Facts

Gerald Grimes is a 53-year-old man who has worked as a truck driver most of his life. His employer, Lakeside, is self-insured under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act (RCW Title 51). In November 1981, Grimes injured…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bering v. ShareWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hilltop Terrace Homeowner's Ass'n v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Nelson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Wendt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Young v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  2. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Cantu v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Eastwood v. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Young v. Dept. of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API