Legal Opinion

Goenen v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1935No. 25309. En BancPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tolman, J. —

The respondent, while employed in extrahazardous work, suffered an.injury on March 8, 1930, and from that injury a hernia developed. In due course, the department authorized operative treatment, which was given. Respondent having recovered, his claim was closed as of September 13, 1930, with a payment for time loss. Thereafter, respondent, who had been blind in his left eye from infancy and the sight of whose right eye was something less than normal, complained to the department of an aggravation and was denied relief. Eventually and in December, 1930, respondent appealed to the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Crabb v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Grimes v. Lakeside IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API