Legal Opinion

Gosek v. Garmer and Stiles Company

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 7, 1968No. 52839PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLINGS, Justice.

The deputy industrial commissioner denied plaintiff-applicant’s claim for additional compensation on second review-reopening hearing. Claimant appealed to district court, and from affirmance of commissioner’s adjudication he takes appeal.

William Gosek, claimant, was injured January 15, 1962, while employed by defendant, Garmer and Stiles Company.

*732October 14, 1963, pursuant to a memorandum agreement, plaintiff was paid $3209 by defendant compensation carrier.

Application for review-reopening was filed by claimant February 4, 1964, on which hearing was held. May 7, 1964, deputy…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Stuart v. PilgrimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  3. Rose v. John Deere Ottumwa WorksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  4. Barton v. Nevada Poultry CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. Messer v. DreesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Becker v. D & E DISTRIBUTING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Mortimer v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Conn v. Ed Wederski Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Deaver v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Kohlhaas v. Hog Slat, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API