Legal Opinion

Lawton v. Case

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1880No. 7593PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellees instituted this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, and succeeded in obtaining judgment.

The complaint is in two paragraphs, to each of which demurrers were overruled.

The first paragraph was clearly bad, because it does not allege that the appellant ivas the owner or claimant of the real estate upon which the appellees seek to enforce a lieu. The materials, for ivhich the lien was filed, were furnished to a contractor, and not to the appellant. The only inference that can reasonably be drawn from the allegations of the pleading is, that Hill, the contractor, and not the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. CrockettIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hill v. SloanIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Hamilton v. NaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. City of Crawfordsville v. LockhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Neeley v. SearightIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Clark v. HueyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. McCarty v. BurnetIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. McGrew v. McCartyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API