Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Brennen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1935No. 25090. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This action, tried to the court without a jury, is to enforce specific performance of an option contract. On April 8, 1929, the plaintiff, Andersen, and the defendant Brennen entered into a written agreement, by the terms of which Andersen sold to Brennen a machine works establishment; the consideration being four thousand dollars in cash and one hundred ten shares of the capital stock of a certain corporation, the shares having a par value of one hundred dollars each. The agreement contained the following provision giving Andersen an option to require Brennen to repurchase the stock:

“In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waterman v. BanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Mason v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  3. Olsen v. Northern Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Sandberg v. LightWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Southern v. SouthernIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Justad v. WardIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Calandro v. KoonsConnecticut Superior Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API