Legal Opinion

Pardee v. Jolly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2008No. 80066-9PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

182 P.3d 967 (2008)

Gary PARDEE, a single person, Petitioner,

v.

Willis JOLLY, a single person, Respondent.

No. 80066-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued February 28, 2008.

Decided May 8, 2008.

Garold Edwin Johnson, Mann Johnson Wooster & McLaughlin, Tacoma, for Petitioner.

David C. Hammermaster, Sumner, for Respondent.

FAIRHURST, J.

¶ 1 Petitioner Gary Pardee, the optionee, filed suit against respondent, Willis Jolly, the optionor, seeking specific performance of an option to purchase real property. The trial court found Pardee performed in accordance with the terms of the contract and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Key Design, Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Oliver, J. v. Ball, L. v. Harmon, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Recreational Equipment, Inc. v. World Wrapps Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API