Legal Opinion

Pardee v. Jolly

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 2008No. 80066-9PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1

Petitioner Gary Pardee, the optionee, filed suit against respondent Willis Jolly, the optionor, seeking specific performance of an option to purchase real property. The trial court found Pardee performed in accordance with the terms of the contract and ordered Jolly to sell the property to Pardee. Jolly appealed and the Court of Appeals reversed. Pardee petitioned this court for discretionary review, which we granted.

Fairhurst, J.

¶ 2 We affirm the Court of Appeals in part and reverse in part. We hold substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Pardee made the final option…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Berg v. TingWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Key Design, Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cornish College of the Arts v. 1000 Virginia Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. Oliver, J. v. Ball, L. v. Harmon, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Recreational Equipment, Inc. v. World Wrapps Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API