Legal Opinion

Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 2, 2009No. Civil Action No. 04-5898PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

STENGEL, District Judge.

This is a putative class action brought by indirect purchasers of Wellbutrin SR. Before the Court is defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket #221), in which they assert that because plaintiffs cannot state a cause of action under the laws of their respective home states, their claims must be dismissed. A resolution of this issue should precede the issues of class certification and summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I will grant defendants’ motion as to all claims asserted under New York law, grant defendants’ motion as to the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API