Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. GlaxoSmithKline, PLC
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
STENGEL, District Judge.
This is a putative class action brought by indirect purchasers of Wellbutrin SR. Before the Court is defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket #221), in which they assert that because plaintiffs cannot state a cause of action under the laws of their respective home states, their claims must be dismissed. A resolution of this issue should precede the issues of class certification and summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, I will grant defendants’ motion as to all claims asserted under New York law, grant defendants’ motion as to the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Niaspan Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- United Food & Commercial Workers Local 1776 v. Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.