Angell v. Pruyn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Daniel M. Angell against John Pruyn for breach of warranty on a sale of fruit trees. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The plaintiff is a farmer living in Ottawa county. Defendant is a nurseryman of Grand Rapids. In the fall'of 1894 plaintiff placed two orders for peach trees with the defendant, — the first for 1,000 and the second for 800; the trees to be of certain varieties specified upon the back of each order respectively. The purchase price for the entire 1,800 trees was $135. Delivery was to be made in the following spring. At the time for delivery, the defendant, not having all the varieties ordered, agreed to substitute for part of the order trees of other varieties, equally as good, which plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hurst v. Detroit City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Stickel v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Connecticut Fire Insurance v. KinneMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. FerrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. Lansing & Suburban Traction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Gensler v. NicholasMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Jones v. PendletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Musselman Grocer Co. v. CaslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Long v. PruynMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.