Legal Opinion

Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Kinne

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applies for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order allowing an amended declaration to be filed. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Neil O’Donnell and Hugh O’Donnell, composing the firm of N. & H. O’Donnell, brought suit in assumpsit in the Monroe county circuit court against the Connecticut Fire Insurance Company. The suit was commenced by summons. A declaration was filed, to which the defendant company filed a plea of the general issue. A trial was had, and judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, February 21, 1888, for the sum of $1,083.48. The case came to this Court, and the judgment was here reversed, and a new trial granted. It will be found reported in 73 Mich. 1 (41 N. W. Rep. 95).

The declaration was upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Gorman v. Judge of the Newaygo Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. O'Donnell v. Connecticut Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance v. DeJarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Johnston v. Farmers' Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Kleis v. Niagara Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. American Mills Co. v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  5. Totten v. Pocahontas Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API