Legal Opinion

Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. Ferris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1897PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Trover by Reid, Murdoch & Company against Jay Ferris. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

Plaintiff was • a wholesale grocery house in Chicago, and defendant a retail grocer in Grand Rapids. This was an action of trover, brought to recover the value of about $1,200 worth of goods sold by plaintiff to defendant between October 30, 1894, and January 9, 1895. The goods were sold at different times during that period, and on different terms of credit, some of the invoices being on 60 days’ time, and others on 30 days’ time; the amount of the largest sale being $238.70, and the smallest one $4. The plaintiff claimed, and introduced evidence tending to show, that the purchases were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farwell v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Aber v. BrattonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Stickel v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Sexton v. McDowdMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  5. McBrian v. MorrisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. . ConnersNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Kruce v. Lakeside Biscuit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Brewster Loud Lumber Co. v. General Builders' Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Angell v. PruynMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Phelps v. AbbottMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API