Legal Opinion

Sax v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 27, 1985No. 2 CA-SA 0296PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Petitioner has brought this special action from the trial court’s order setting aside a default. An order vacating an entry of default is not an appealable order, Richas v. Superior Court, 133 Ariz. 512, 652 P.2d 1035 (1982), and because we believe the trial court abused its discretion in entering the order, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

The real parties in interest were served with a summons and complaint on January 24, 1985. They were required to file an answer by February 13. Rule 12(a), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. On February 15 they had not filed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. NguyenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. In Re $200.00Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  3. Murillo v. TuckettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API