Legal Opinion

Laubscher v. Blake

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1935No. Civ. 9568PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when a Lincoln limousine in which he was riding collided with a Buick automobile driven by defendant Kennedy. The ear in which plaintiff was riding was owned and driven by defendant Rose who had been engaged by defendant Suhr & Wieboldt, a corporation, to drive it to Woodlawn Cemetery as a funeral car. Defendant Rose filed a cross-complaint against defendant Kennedy for damages to his automobile. Defendant Kennedy likewise filed a cross-complaint against defendant Rose and defendant Suhr & Wieboldt for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Townsend v. KeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Johnson v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Bezera v. Associated Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Goehring v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Malinson v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. California Steel Buildings, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Harabedian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API