Legal Opinion
Reis v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.),' entered on or about May 2, 1989, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 and 3212 and denied plaintiffs cross motion for leave to amend the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3025 to add the New York City Transit Authority as a party defendant, is unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Plaintiff was injured while a passenger on a bus owned and operated by the New York City Transit Authority (NYCTA). Plaintiff served a notice of claim and summons and complaint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Rosas v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Zaiman v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Laverpool v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- In re the Arbitration between City of Buffalo & Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.