Legal Opinion
Laverpool v. New York City Transit Authority
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided October 31, 1993No. CV 90-2327 (ADS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The plaintiffs rested them case on October 18, 1993, with the exception of certain exhibits, namely a Department of Transportation Report and a summary of the information contained in the Transit Authority drug test computer printout (Plaintiffs Exhibit 10). The defendants New York City Transit Authority (“Transit Authority”) and Robert F. Kiley move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a), for a judgment as a matter of law dismissing the ease.
On October 19-20, 1993, the Court rendered its decision on the motion for judgment as a matter of law from…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Earls Ex Rel. Earls v. Board of Education of Tecumseh Public School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2000
- M.O.C.H.A. Society, Inc. v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
- Knighton v. City of Syracuse Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2001
- Jones v. Associated Universities, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Briggs v. StanglAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.