Legal Opinion
Luka v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 5, 1984PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bloom, J.
On January 22, 1981, plaintiff Joseph Luka was injured while endeavoring to board a bus operated by Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority (MABSTOA). Within the 90-day period limited by law (Public Authorities Law, § 1212, subd 2; General Municipal Law, § 50-e), he served a notice of claim on New York City *324Transit Authority (NYCTA). NYCTA forwarded the notice to MABSTOA, which gave the claim a number and noticed the oral examination of Joseph Luka. NYCTA and MABSTOA are separate and distinct bodies corporate (Public Authorities Law, § 1201, subd…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pierson v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Bender v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hamptons Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by35 opinions
- Ceely v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Luka v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Gross v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Landmark Colony at Oyster Bay v. Board of SupervisorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nowinski v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.