Legal Opinion
State v. Miscellaneous Fireworks
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 27, 2011No. AC 31959PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Miscellaneous Fireworks (B.J. Alan Company). On appeal, the plaintiff contends that the court erred in (1) requiring that the plaintiff bear the burden of proof 1 and (2) determining that the five gram chlorate and perchlorate limits established in General Statutes § 29-357 applies to each fountain in a multifountain pyrotechnic device. In response, the defendant argues that we should not reach the merits of these claims because (1) the state is not authorized to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whalen v. IvesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In the Matter of Gilhuly's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Smith v. MuellnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ReddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. EvansConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- State v. Darante H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012