Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clark

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1992No. 1485PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order dated April 10, 1991 granting appellee’s omnibus pretrial motion. On appeal, the Commonwealth contends that the suppression court erred by suppressing the evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. For the following reasons, we affirm the suppression order.

*94On June 15, 1990, two Chester Police officers from the narcotics and vice division appeared before a District Justice. They presented an affidavit which recited, inter alia, that a confidential informant (Cl) had witnessed appellee within the previous forty-eight hours…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. CameronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API