Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Antoszyk

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 2009No. 689 WDA 2008PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

¶ 1 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania appeals from the order entered in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas, which granted the suppression motion filed by Appellee, Nolan Antoszyk. The Commonwealth contends an affidavit that includes material misstatements from a confidential informant should not render inadmissible evidence obtained from a warrant approved on the basis of the faulty affidavit. Because the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule does not apply in Pennsylvania, we hold that the trial court properly suppressed the evidence obtained solely…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Com. v. Batista, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, L., Jr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API