Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Antoszyk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 2012No. 3 WAP 2011PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2012, the Court being evenly divided, the Order of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Justices SAYLOR, BAER, and TODD would affirm the Order of the Superior Court. Justice EAKIN files an Opinion in Support of Reversal in which Chief Justice CASTILLE and Justice McCAFFERY join. Justice EAKIN, in support of reversal.

This Court affirms, by operation of an equally divided vote, the Superior Court’s holding that a search warrant is invalid if the affidavit of probable cause…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. BurgosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Batista, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, L., Jr.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  5. Com. v. Batista, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API