Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Murphy

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DEL SOLE, P.J.

¶ 1 Following a jury trial, Appellant James Leonard Murphy was convicted of various violations of the Wiretap Act and related crimes. He was sentenced to 12 months’ probation plus fines and costs. This direct appeal followed. We affirm.

¶ 2 The charges arose after it was discovered that Appellant had placed an illegal wiretap on his girlfriend’s telephone. On this appeal, Appellant raises the following issues.

A. WHETHER THE JUDGMENT OF SENTENCE MUST BE VACATED AND APPELLANT DISCHARGED BECAUSE HE WAS SELECTIVELY PROSECUTED IN VIOLATION OF HIS STATE AND FEDERAL…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. PeterkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. TorresSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. ViallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Commonwealth v. AntoszykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Commonwealth v. StetlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API