Legal Opinion
City of Hartford v. Kirley
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1992No. 91-1390-OAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
This is an original action, brought pursuant to sec. 809.70, Stats. 1989-90, by the City of Hartford, Wisconsin, against Dean T. Kirley and John C. Spielmann, respectively the mayor and city clerk for the City of Hartford. The City of Hartford (City) seeks a declaratory judgment that the tax incremental bonds (TIF bonds) it plans to issue for Tax Incremental District No. 4 (TID No. 4) pursuant to sec. 66.46, Stats. 1989-90, do not constitute debt within the meaning of art. XI, sec. 3, of the Wisconsin Constitution.
For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that the City's TIF bonds for TID…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Thomson v. GiesselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Libertarian Party of Wisconsin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Voters with Facts v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Town of Baraboo v. Village of West BarabooCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.