People v. Rushlow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from convictions after a jury trial of burglary, third degree, grand larceny, third degree, and criminal possession of stolen property, second degree, defendant argues that the testimony of two accomplices was not corroborated (see CPL 60.22) and that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial (see CPL 30.30). We disagree. The accomplice testimony was sufficiently corroborated by the testimony of one Addley, not an accomplice in the offense charged or a related offense (see CPL 60.22, subd 2), that defendant recounted to him…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. GlasperNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. OzarowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Peolpe v. McCafferyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- People v. FioreNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. KlausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. DavilaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.