People v. Glasper
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Contrary to defendant’s contention, there was sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice. Although corroborative evidence must be truly independent, and may not draw its probative value from the accomplice testimony (People v Hudson, 51 NY2d 233), it need not itself prove commission of the crime. Rather, it is sufficient if the corroborative evidence tends to connect the defendant to the crime so as to reasonably satisfy the jury that the accomplice is telling the truth…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. RumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by102 opinions
- People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BesserNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- People v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. DoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.