Legal Opinion

People v. Glasper

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1981PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention, there was sufficient independent evidence to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice. Although corroborative evidence must be truly independent, and may not draw its probative value from the accomplice testimony (People v Hudson, 51 NY2d 233), it need not itself prove commission of the crime. Rather, it is sufficient if the corroborative evidence tends to connect the defendant to the crime so as to reasonably satisfy the jury that the accomplice is telling the truth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. RumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. People v. MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BesserNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. DoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API