People v. White
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, defendant argues that the evidence was not legally sufficient to convict him because the accomplice testimony was not corroborated as required by CPL 60.22 (1). There is no merit to this claim. The court properly instructed the jury that one of the participants in the crimes was an accomplice as a matter of law (see, CPL 60.22 [2]; People v Tillotson, 63 NY2d 731; People v Minarich, 46 NY2d 970), but that it was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. BaschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. CobosNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BurginNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MinarichNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. DortaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gaiter v. LordDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. HaddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DawsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- SMITH, DEMARIO, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017