Ames v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover upon a policy of hail insurance; he prevailed in the lower court, and defendant appealed.
The policy is a standard form which required notice of loss, proof of loss and contained the following provision, and other provisions of like import: “No officer, agent, or other representative of this company shall have the power to waive any provision of this policy, except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject Of agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto; and as to such provisions or conditions no officer, agent, or representative shall have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Nutting v. Kings County Elevated Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Snell v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Reeves v. National Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Pasherstnik v. Continental InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- La Bonte v. Mutual Fire & Lightning InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Montana Auto Finance Corp. v. Federal Surety Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1929
- Krause v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Federal Land Bank v. Rocky Mountain Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.