Legal Opinion
Pasherstnik v. Continental Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1923No. 5,055PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. COMMISSIONER FELT
prepared the opinion for the court.
This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover from the defendant the amount due on a policy of hail insurance for losses alleged to have been sustained by reason of two separate hailstorms occurring on August 2 and August 11, 1920, respectively. Trial was had to a jury. The verdict *22was for the plaintiff, and the court rendered judgment thereon. The defendant moved the court for a new trial, which motion was overruled. The appeal is from the judgment and from the order overruling the motion for a new trial.
The appeal presents three…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. MittendorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Da Rin v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Teasdale v. City of New York InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Snell v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Reeves v. National Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
3Cited by8 opinions
- La Bonte v. Mutual Fire & Lightning InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1925
- Lee v. Providence Washington InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. California Cotton Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- Bank Savings Life Insurance v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Ames v. Minneapolis Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.