Legal Opinion

Damak v. Super. Ct.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 2026No. G065583Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 7/8/26 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE AZIZ DAMAK, Petitioner, v. G065583 THE SUPERIOR COURT OF (Super. Ct. No. 30-2023- ORANGE COUNTY, 01355579) Respondent; OPINION SANGITA KHANNA et al., Real Parties in Interest. Original proceedings; petition for a writ of mandate to challenge an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Richard Y. Lee, Judge. Petition granted in part and denied in part. Aziz Damak, in pro. per., for Petitioner. Law Offices of Norman A. Filer and Hitendra Bhakta for Real Parties…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Trope v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API