Legal Opinion

Foster v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 20, 1983No. 34-75PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARKINS, Judge.

Disposition of this taking case has been protracted. Substantial amounts of litigating time and effort have been expended by counsel and by the courts. Plaintiffs’ petition (now complaint) was filed in the United States Court of Claims on February 7, 1975. There was a 10-day trial in January-February 1977 on both liability and quantum issues. The trial judge’s opinion, filed on October 18, 1978, concluded that there' had been a temporary taking, and that the *739date of taking was November 18, 1971. In an opinion dated October 17, 1979,1 the Court of Claims determined that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Albrecht v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Andrew H. Yancey and Elizabeth H. Yancey, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. ITT Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Yaist v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Hedstrom Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API