Ingram v. Sauset
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was brought by respondent, as plaintiff, to recover for labor, material and supplies performed and furnished for and to appellant Sauset, upon a contract for street improvements in the city of Bellingham. The appellant United States Fidelity *445and Guaranty Company is the surety on the bond given by Sauset conditioned for the performance of the terms of the contract. The principal defense, and the one here involved, was a plea of accord and satisfaction. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in respondent’s favor for the full amount claimed, and from a judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Canton Union Coal Co. v. Parlin & Orendorff Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- LeDoux v. Seattle North Pacific Shipbuilding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bellingham Securities Syndicate, Inc. v. Bellingham Coal Mines, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Lenchitsky v. H. J. Sandberg Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. Skinner & Eddy CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1928
- Washington Fish & Oyster Co. v. G. P. Halferty & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.