Legal Opinion

Phippen v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Bay; Maxwell, J. Case by Mary J. Phippen against the Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Company for personal injuries. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant for $150. The defendant appeals, assigning a number of errors, some of which are not discussed in the brief of counsel, and for that reason will not be discussed here. It was the claim of the plaintiff that, while she was sitting in an open car owned by the defendant, it was run into by another car, and that she received severe injuries (describing them in her declaration) . ,It was averred in the declaration, and was claimed by the plaintiff, that prior to the accident she was strong and healthy; that, as the result of the injuries, she is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Maclean v. ScrippsMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. People v. WirthMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Thurstin v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Warren v. HalleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hill v. Abram Smith & SonMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lindsay v. Wabash Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Glasier v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Litten v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API