Litten v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Oakland; Smith, J. Case by George Litten against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment obtained against it by plaintiff for injuries received upon a defective walk. The only error relied upon by counsel relates to that part of the charge of the judge reading as follows:
“Of course, 'gentlemen, although not much has been said about it, this will follow: That if he was somewhat ruptured before the accident occurred, and was additionally ruptured by the accident, then the previous condition will be taken into consideration in passing upon how much or how little his earnings will be diminished. ”
It was the claim of the plaintiff that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Phippen v. Bay Cities Consolidated Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1896